Thanks.

The user story should always be testable at the end of a sprint, but it’s the level of the test that I wanted to show. We need to be able to test them, but the test it selves is not necessarily a test that makes much sense standalone. Yes I know this is a somewhat contradiction to Scrum, but this is a pragmatic approach which has shown good results for years in my projects.

Cheers!

We’re running into some of the same questions you have the top of your post, and our thinking is that a feature can span multiple sprints, yes – but that if it does, it should be considered an “epic” feature, and be broken down into smaller features/user stories, each of which is able to be completed within one sprint, and each of which is deliverable and testable.

If your user story is not testable because it depends on other pieces – it seems like that is a scheduling issue?

please help me of any one know the answer i was struck with that issue

I just made it simple and easy to demonstrate the key principles

For my regular work-week check lists I use templates in OneNote with just check boxes (not synching with outlook tasks) as these are recurring each week.

On the projects I manage, I always require that we have a wiki for documentation, this is where I also keep the checklists for the projects. These check lists are plain text files/or just nubered lists.

I normally use Outlook tasks to follow up on the issues I find using my check lists, but I don’t like Outlook tasks that much, and I don’t think I can add “group of tasks” as templates there neither

How do you express your checklists? Post-Its? Text Files? Outlook Tasks? Custom applications?

http://iserialized.com/upgrading-caliburn/

It describes whats different and need to be changed to upgrade.

Cheers
Steve

Forbidden
You don’t have permission to access / on this server.

I’m using VS2010

I’ll keep those differences in mind

if (myClass.GetType().IsAssignableFrom(typeof(AnotherClass)))
{
//do something
}

But the following b), c), d) cannot be applied to the view.

Thanks for the suggestion. However, it did’t work for me. I am using Windows 7 (64bit) with office 2010. Do you have any other suggestions? Thanks!

Check your naming of class and namespace in App.xaml and App.xaml.cs, might be something like that!
Cheeers!

Paul

Error 2 The type ‘ApplicationModel:CaliburnApplication’ was not found. Verify that you are not missing an assembly reference and that all referenced assemblies have been built. D:\Install\CaliburnCalculator\CaliburnCalculator\CaliburnCalculator\App.xaml 1 2 CaliburnCalculator

Comparing using the is keyword will return true if an instance is compatible with a type, but using Equals(typeof(…) will return true if the types have an exact match.
So in the case of inheritance, using the two compare methods might produce different results.

Cheers
Paul!

Regards.

http://www.filehub.iserialized.com/CaliburnCalculator.zip

Cheers
Paul

Thanks

Thomas

I guess that means you move forward in your quest the .Net glory!

The unit tests classes become somewhat hard to read, but I’d rather prefer that over not unit testing private methods or worse, changing them to public methods just to be able to test them!

If you want to do this, them force them through an interface.

You are absolutely right! The deferred execution results in the behavior you describe: The method will not execute until you actually use the data from it, eg. through an iteration and then the debugger will also be able to enter the method.

Thanks for the clarification on this!

Perhaps this is what you meant anyway, but I thought it worth clarifying.

b) Change Slider View’s xaml definition to
cal:Message.Attach=”[Event ValueChanged]=[Action SquareIt()]”

c) You have to remove the Name=”SquareIt” from Silver views’ xaml. It seems this example was for Silverlight.

d) Remove Interval property from Slider definition in Slider Views’ xaml. You can use SmallChange in silverlight.

But still, it’s rather dirty to read in the reflection approach

Having had just the same problem recently (but Visual Studio’s test tool, not NUnit), I found two other ways of doing it.

1- Have Visual Studio generate a private accessor
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms184807.aspx

2- Defining InternalsVisibleToAttribute as part of the assembly definition
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.runtime.compilerservices.internalsvisibletoattribute.aspx

Cheers

In fact, we work closely with the author of NLog. We’ll be supporting NLog 2.0 and he endorses Gibraltar as the best analysis tool for NLog:
http://nlog-project.org/blog/2009/11/01/gibraltar-adapter-for-nlog-released.html

That said, I’m very impressed with WordPress! I’ve come further in 24 hrs with WordPress than 24 months with Blogger

I guess what you meant to say is that you should’ve recompiled *PHP* with ssl support It’s much like missing a required DLL for a .NET application.

The deferred nature is very useful, when I discovered this feature it suddenly made sense to me that I was not able to debug a yield method.

http://bloggerautofollow.blogspot.com

Regarding the StackPanel, I only use StackPanel for example purposes.

Hope this helps!

Paul

just another question.
The shell window consists of a StackPanel which bounds to a collection holding 'Presenters'. Ok, this give me a lot of flexibility.
But, I need something like an explorer window. The left pane holds a list of commands and the right pane (the content pane) shows different input masks or what ever. So its a MultiPresenter scenario, but you cant implement it using a single presenter collection …..

Dis you?

With best regards

Gerhard

I am looking out for a good WPF framework and struggle over Caliburn. I don't try out the sample but I read the text carefully.

Caliburn use some naming conventions to tie up the different parts, so we don't have to write some infrastructure description files in xml or whatever. Nice.
But what is this naming convention, if you want more than one view associated to a Viewmodel? Or is the naming convention only good enough for simple apps and you have to do different steps to get a complex app running??

Thanks for helping

Gerhard

Thanks
$enthil

You will find the interfaces and class you ask for in the second code-listing in the post. Right after the text: "Here we will just make a very simple version of the Event Aggregator, as this is not the focus in this example"

The event aggregator is just a simple implementation I wrote for this example.

Just let me know if you still have problems with this!

Best regards
Paul

IEventAggregator and ISubscriber could not be found in any of the referenced dlls.

It seems that CaliburnCalculator.EventAggregator class is missing and ISubscriber interface.

Please help me out to solve this debugging issue.

Thanks,
$enthil

If you go through all this and you still have a problem we should at least have ruled out problems with the unit adapter. If it still fails, could you check that shellView exists? and also post the content of shellView.xaml and ShellViewModel.cs here?

Hope it helps!

First of all. Thanks very much for your useful post.

I just came across your blog and wanted to drop you a note telling you how impressed I was with the information you have posted here.

Please let me introduce you some info related to this post and I hope that it is useful for .Net community.

There is a good C# resource site, Have alook

http://www.csharptalk.com

simi

First of all. Thanks very much for your useful post.

I just came across your blog and wanted to drop you a note telling you how impressed I

was with the information you have posted here.

Please let me introduce you some info related to this post and I hope that it is useful

for .Net community.

There is a good C# resource site, Have alook

http://www.csharptalk.com

simi